The proposed ballot initiatives could have gone before voters in November, but now they will not. Their pre-emptive passage by lawmakers is part of an unprecedented business-backed strategy — the legality of which is in question — to make them easier to alter during the “lame-duck” period in November or December. If voters had passed the measures, legislators would have needed three-fourths majorities in each chamber to change them, instead of the simple majority votes they will need now.

Many Democrats, including state Rep. Sara Cambensy, voted no.

“Any time we have a ballot initiative in Michigan, we owe it to the people of our state to allow them to vote it up or down. (Wednesday), we saw yet another example of Legislative overreach when the citizens of Michigan gathered hundreds of thousands of signatures to get these issues on the ballot, and we took that vote away from them,” Cambensy, D-Marquette, said in prepared remarks distributed to media. “When we as legislators decide to pull initiatives off the ballot like this, even the governor is prohibited by our state constitution to veto them. In order to protect democracy and the people’s right to petition their government, legislators in Lansing must always use extreme caution when deciding whether or not to interfere. Otherwise, we risk weakening our state institution and the checks and balances put in place, and ultimately, the public’s trust.”

State Rep. Scott Dianda, D-Calumet, voted yes.

State Rep. Sara Cambensy, D-Marquette

“I’m all for a bigger paycheck and earned paid sick leave, because workers shouldn’t have to struggle to pay their bills, or fear for their jobs if they or a family member are sick. I voted yes today in support of the working families who have been waiting patiently to see their share of prosperity and bigger paychecks,” Dianda noted in prepared remarks. “Should Republican leadership attempt to walk back from back from that commitment later on this year, I will fight to preserve the integrity of the bill and the will of the voters who signed the initiative.”

Sen. Curtis Hertel Jr., of East Lansing, called

the maneuver “nothing more than a classic bait-and-switch, a trick on the voters here in Michigan, an attack on our democracy.” And Rep. Leslie Love of Detroit said it is a form of “voter suppression.”

The Senate voted 24-13 to pass both bills, with three Republicans and 10 Democrats in opposition. The votes were 78-28 in the House, where more Democrats joined most Republicans in support — declaring victory while vowing to fight any attempt to scale back the laws.

Under the Michigan Constitution, legislators can adopt a ballot initiative, making it law; reject it, putting it to a statewide vote; or propose an alternative to appear alongside the measure on the ballot. Since approval of the 1963 constitution, lawmakers have adopted seven initiatives but amended just one — and it was not in the same legislative session.

The group backing the $12 minimum wage, One Fair Wage, promised to sue the Legislature if it tries to amend the measure later this year, saying it would be unconstitutional to do so this term.

State Rep. Scott Dianda, D-Calumet

Republican leaders, however, said making changes would be legal.

“We’re going to consider different options, a whole suite of different things that we may think are more friendly to Michigan to make sure that workers are indeed cared for and that still provide for economic development for the state to keep moving forward,” said Senate Majority Leader Arlan Meekhof of West Olive, declining to elaborate. House Speaker Tom Leonard of DeWitt said there is no plan in place yet to change the “poorly written” laws, but lawmakers will now have more flexibility going forward.

Michigan’s hourly minimum wage is $9.25 and, starting in 2019, it is currently set to increase annually with inflation unless the unemployment rate is high. If the new law stays intact, the wage will rise to $10 in 2019, $10.65 in 2020, $11.35 in 2021 and $12 in 2022, with yearly inflationary adjustments afterward.

The minimum wage for tipped employees will gradually increase from the current $3.52 until reaching the minimum wage for all other workers in 2024. That provision, in particular, has drawn opposition from restaurants.

The sick time law will require that workers earn one hour of paid leave for every 30 hours worked. Employees at businesses with at least 10 workers could use up to 72 hours of paid leave a year, unless an employer selects a higher limit. Those working for smaller employers could use up to 40 hours of paid time and another 32 hours of unpaid leave.

Charlie Owens, state director for the small business group NFIB, which had called for both initiatives to be kept off the ballot, credited legislators for preserving their right “to have a measured and informed debate on these issues and craft practical and sound solutions that work for the people of our state, rather than an all-or-nothing extreme mandate imposed by outside special interest groups.”

Not every Republican is comfortable with the strategy.

Sen. Patrick Colbeck, of Wayne County’s Canton Township, opposes the initiatives but said the GOP should have fought them at the ballot box. He called the maneuver a “procedural gimmick” and said “that’s not how we should be doing things.”

A spokesman for Republican Gov. Rick Snyder declined to comment on the move or the new laws, saying he would carefully review any future bills before deciding whether to sign them.

Minimum wage initiative: https://bit.ly/2wMsWSz

Paid sick time initiative: https://bit.ly/2wPeuKe.

Follow David Eggert on Twitter at https://twitter.com/ DavidEggert00. His work can be found at https://apnews.com/ search/David%20Eggert.

Newsletter

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)

• Daily Newsletter
• Breaking News
• Obituaries

Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper *

• Yes
• No