Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Affiliated Sites | Home RSS
 
 
 

Teacher benefit changes

August 16, 2012
By Jackie Stark - Journal Staff Writer , The Mining Journal and The Associated Press

LANSING - Legislation approved Wednesday and headed to Gov. Rick Snyder's desk will require Michigan public school employees to pay more for their pensions and will cut state-provided health coverage in retirement.

"It's asking way too much," said Stu Skauge, UNISERV director of Marquette and Alger counties for the state teacher union Michigan Education Association. "(Teaching) is not a very attractive field to go into."

The Republican-controlled state Senate and House approved a measure that officials say would cut more than $15 billion from a $45 billion liability on the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System. The reductions include a $130 million contribution by the state toward retirement costs.

Article Photos

SKAUGE

That funding, along with the 3 percent contributions school employees are required to make, would significantly decrease the retirement system's shortfall. Also under the bill, new public school hires would get a match of up to 2 percent plus a lump sum upon retirement to pay for health insurance. Retired employees covered by state-provided insurance would pay at least 20 percent of their premiums.

"It's really going to hurt our present retirees," Skauge said. "The MEA has more people retired than we have active members. It's going to raise what they pay for their health insurance ... That's another kick in the butt for the retirees. The state already passed the law that retirees have to pay income tax on their pensions, which they were told all the years they were saving into their pension plans, in Michigan, youu pensions were not taxed."

Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville said the legislation isn't perfect, but it was important to carefully examine the financial impact of switching to a defined contribution plan and pass the health care piece of it now. That, he said, sends a signal to Wall Street that Michigan is taking care of its economic problems.

"This is a big step for financial accountability," he said.

It also ends some uncertainty that had been facing local school districts as they tried to set their budgets for the upcoming school year.

"At long last, Michigan's school leaders can move forward on educational initiatives without the negative budget impact of steeply rising retirement costs," William Mayes, executive director of the Michigan Association of School Administrators, said in a statement.

Still, the measure does not take another step favored by some in the Republican majority and a centerpiece of previously passed Senate legislation: scrapping pensions for new hires and pushing them into a 401 (k)-style retirement plan.

The measure calls for a third-party group to conduct a study due by Nov. 15 that would determine, among other things, the cost of ending pensions. Some lawmakers and Snyder administration officials have argued such a plan would cost billions to implement.

Republicans have said the point of the legislation is to save the retirement system, adding that legacy costs could put the whole thing in jeopardy. Democratic lawmakers have echoed concerns raised by retired and current teachers, arguing the changes erode promises of pensions and health care coverage in retirement. Many teachers already saw their personal pension contributions increased in 2007, and now will have to pay state income taxes on their pensions under legislation passed last year.

The retirement system has 444,185 members, including 192,435 retirees.

 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web